Suing for Head Injuries When Riding Without a DOT-Approved Helmet in Massachusetts
Massachusetts law mandates the use of a DOT-approved helmet. If you suffer a head injury while wearing a 'novelty' helmet or no helmet at all, the defense will use comparative negligence to reduce your payout, but you can still win if you prove the helmet failure did not cause the specific injury.
The feeling of the wind in your face is one of the greatest joys of riding, leading many bikers to opt for lightweight "skull caps" or novelty helmets. However, when an accident happens, the type of helmet you were wearing becomes a central focus of the insurance company's defense strategy. If you suffered a head injury while wearing a non-compliant helmet, the adjuster will immediately try to deny your claim. To combat these aggressive legal tactics, you should utilize our United States lawyer directory to find an attorney who specializes in traumatic motorcycle injuries.
Novelty Helmets vs. DOT Standards
In this state, the law is unambiguous. Under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 90, § 7, every person operating or riding as a passenger on a motorcycle must wear protective headgear that conforms to the minimum standards set by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles. These regulations mandate helmets that meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 218, commonly known as DOT approval. Novelty helmets, skull caps, and vintage helmets without a thick EPS foam liner and a DOT sticker are legally considered equivalent to wearing no helmet at all.
The Comparative Negligence Defense
If you are struck by a negligent driver and suffer a severe injury, the defense attorney will immediately request the helmet for inspection. If it is a novelty helmet, they will argue comparative negligence. Much like the "seatbelt defense" seen in historical precedents such as Shahzade v. C.J. Mabardy, Inc., 411 Mass. 788 (MA Supreme Judicial Court 1992), the defense will claim that while their driver caused the crash, your decision to break the helmet law directly caused or worsened your head injury. They will ask the jury to assign a high percentage of fault to you, potentially barring you from any recovery under the state's 51% rule.
Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI) Compensation
Despite wearing a non-compliant helmet, you can still recover massive compensation for a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) if your attorney can prove that a DOT-approved helmet would not have made a difference. This is a highly technical legal battle.
For example, if a commercial truck runs a red light and hits you at 60 mph, the sheer kinetic force transferred to your brain could be so massive that even the highest-rated full-face helmet would have failed to prevent the TBI. Your lawyer must argue that the driver's extreme negligence is the sole proximate cause of the brain bleed, not your choice of headgear. To officially initiate a civil lawsuit involving these complex claims, your lawyer will file a complaint along with Form SC0001, Massachusetts, Trial Court, Civil Action Cover Sheet at a venue like the Plymouth County Superior Court, Brockton.
Facial Scarring Claims
State law only mandates headgear; it does not explicitly mandate a full-face shield. Therefore, if you were wearing a fully DOT-approved "half helmet" (open face) and you suffered severe facial road rash or broken jawbones, the insurance company cannot legally claim you violated the helmet statute. Facial scarring can result in significant settlements for permanent disfigurement, and the defense cannot use comparative negligence against you simply because you chose an open-face style that complied with the law.
Working with Biomechanical Experts
To win a head injury case involving a novelty helmet, your attorney will rely on biomechanical engineers. These experts analyze the crash dynamics, the speed of impact, and the exact angle of the head strike. They will provide testimony in courts like the Hampden County Superior Court, Springfield, demonstrating that the g-forces involved were so extreme that a legally compliant helmet would have crushed or failed anyway, effectively neutralizing the insurance company's primary defense.
Costs of Expert Testimony
Fighting the helmet defense requires significant financial resources, which your personal injury law firm will typically advance on your behalf.
| Biomechanical Engineer | Proves crash dynamics and helmet efficacy | $3,000 to $7,000 |
| Neurologist / Neurosurgeon | Testifies regarding the permanent nature of the TBI | $5,000 to $10,000 |
| Accident Reconstructionist | Calculates impact speeds and driver negligence | $2,500 to $5,000 |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
If I wasn't wearing a helmet, can I still get paid for my broken leg?
Yes. The lack of a helmet is only relevant to head and neck injuries. It has absolutely no bearing on orthopedic injuries to your arms, legs, or torso.
What makes a helmet DOT approved?
A DOT-approved helmet must meet FMVSS 218 standards, which require a thick inner polystyrene foam liner, strong chin straps, and an official DOT sticker on the back.
Can the police confiscate my novelty helmet after a crash?
While they generally won't confiscate it at the scene, the opposing insurance company's defense lawyers will legally demand it during the "discovery" phase of the lawsuit to use as evidence.
Does the state require passengers to wear helmets?
Yes. State law mandates that both the operator and any passengers on a motorcycle must wear DOT-approved protective headgear at all times.
What if my helmet flew off during the crash?
If your helmet came off, the defense may argue it was not properly fastened. Your attorney will need to prove that the force of the impact snapped the strap or caused a mechanical failure of the buckle.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!