How the Michigan Motorcycle Helmet Law Exception Impacts Your Injury Settlement
Michigan law allows riders over 21 to ride without a helmet if they have at least $20,000 in medical coverage. However, if you suffer a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) while riding bareheaded, insurance defense lawyers will argue comparative negligence to drastically reduce your settlement.
Riding a motorcycle provides a sense of freedom, and Michigan laws allow certain riders to experience the open road without a helmet. However, exercising this freedom comes with immense legal and financial risks if you get into a crash. Insurance companies are businesses, and their defense lawyers will use your choice to ride bareheaded against you to minimize your compensation. Searching our USA Lawyer Directory for a skilled local attorney can help protect your rights, but you must first understand the legal landscape surrounding helmets and injuries.
The Michigan Motorcycle Helmet Law Exception
Under Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.658, motorcyclists in Michigan can legally ride without a helmet if they meet three strict criteria: they must be at least 21 years old, have held a motorcycle endorsement for at least two years (or passed a safety course), and carry a minimum of $20,000 in first-party medical benefits coverage. If a police officer from the Michigan State Police, Lansing pulls you over, they may ask for proof of this insurance. When an accident occurs, details are documented on Form UD-10, Michigan, Michigan State Police, Traffic Crash Report.
How Comparative Negligence Reduces TBI Payouts
Even if you were riding completely legally without a helmet, getting hit by a negligent driver does not guarantee a full payout. Michigan follows a "comparative negligence" rule under Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2959. If you sue the at-fault driver for a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), their defense attorney will argue that your failure to wear a helmet contributed to the severity of your injury. If a jury in a court like the Macomb County Circuit Court, Mount Clemens decides you were 40% at fault for your own head injury by not wearing a helmet, your financial award for pain and suffering will be reduced by 40%.
Full-Face vs. Skull Cap Helmets
Not all helmets offer the same legal protection. If you suffer facial fractures while wearing a half-helmet (skull cap), defense lawyers will still argue comparative negligence, claiming a full-face helmet would have prevented the injury. While you may have complied with the minimum legal requirement, the defense will focus on the "reasonableness" of your safety gear.
DOT-Approved vs. Novelty Helmets
Wearing a novelty helmet that lacks Department of Transportation (DOT) certification is legally equivalent to wearing no helmet at all. Precedents in injury law establish that failing to use certified safety equipment can be used to assign fault. If your DOT-approved helmet fails during a crash, your attorney might even have a product liability claim against the manufacturer.
Passengers Riding Bareheaded
Passengers must also meet the age and insurance requirements to ride without a helmet. If a passenger chooses to ride bareheaded and suffers a head injury, the defense will use the same comparative negligence arguments against them, potentially reducing their recovery from both the at-fault car driver and the motorcycle operator if the operator caused the crash.
Distinguishing Between Body Injuries and Head/Neck Injuries
It is vital to understand that not wearing a helmet only affects claims related to head, neck, and facial injuries. If you are struck by a car and suffer a shattered femur or a broken arm, the defense cannot use your lack of a helmet to reduce your compensation for those specific body injuries. A helmet would not have saved your leg. A skilled lawyer will forcefully separate the damages to maximize your settlement.
Settlement Impacts and Associated Costs
A TBI can cost millions in lifetime care. The financial impact of a comparative negligence finding is massive.
| $1,000,000 TBI Settlement (0% Fault) | $1,000,000 |
| $1,000,000 TBI Settlement (50% Fault for no helmet) | $500,000 (You lose $500,000) |
| Expert Medical Witness Fees | $3,000 to $10,000 (To prove the helmet wouldn't have helped) |
Timelines for Filing a Lawsuit
In Michigan, you generally have three years from the date of the crash to file a civil lawsuit for pain and suffering against the at-fault driver. This statute of limitations is strictly enforced. It often takes 1 to 2 years of litigation before a settlement or trial is reached.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Does riding without a helmet void my PIP medical benefits?
No. Personal Injury Protection (PIP) is no-fault insurance. If a motor vehicle was involved in the crash, your PIP benefits will cover your medical bills regardless of whether you wore a helmet or who was at fault.
What if the driver who hit me was drunk?
If the at-fault driver was intoxicated, it strengthens your case significantly. However, defense attorneys may still attempt to assign some percentage of comparative fault to you for your head injuries if you were unhelmeted.
Is the $20,000 medical coverage enough?
Usually not. The law requires $20,000 in coverage to ride bareheaded, but a severe brain injury can generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills within the first week alone.
Can the jury find me more than 50% at fault for not wearing a helmet?
In Michigan, if a jury determines you are more than 50% at fault for your own injuries, you are completely barred from recovering non-economic damages (pain and suffering), although you can still recover some economic damages.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!