How New Mexico's Pure Comparative Negligence Law Impacts Your Car Accident Settlement
New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. This means you can still recover compensation for your car accident injuries even if you are found to be up to 99 percent at fault. However, your final settlement will be reduced by your exact percentage of blame.
Getting into a car crash in New Mexico can leave you confused about who should pay for the damages, especially if both drivers made mistakes. Unlike states that bar you from recovering money if you are partially at fault, New Mexico uses a very fair system called "pure comparative negligence." Whether you were hit on I-25 in Albuquerque or at a busy intersection in Las Cruces, understanding how this law impacts your car accident settlement is crucial. Insurance companies often try to use this rule to unfairly shift the blame onto you. This guide explains how fault is divided and how an attorney can protect your financial recovery.
Understanding Pure Comparative Fault in New Mexico
The legal foundation for dividing blame in New Mexico is found in NMSA 1978, § 41-3A-1, which dictates how joint and several liability and comparative fault are handled. In a landmark decision, Scott v. Rizzo, 96 N.M. 682 (NM Supreme Court 1981), the state officially adopted pure comparative negligence. Under this rule, a jury or an insurance adjuster assigns a percentage of fault to everyone involved. If your total damages are $100,000, but you are found 20 percent at fault, you will receive $80,000. Even if you are 90 percent at fault, you can technically still recover 10 percent of your damages from the other driver.
Disputing Fault in Red Light Crashes
Intersection collisions are very common in cities like Albuquerque and Santa Fe. Suppose the other driver runs a red light and hits you, but you were texting and failed to notice them in time to brake. The adjuster might argue that your distracted driving contributed to the crash. Cases handled in the Second Judicial District Court, Albuquerque often involve deep investigations into traffic camera footage and phone records to accurately apportion fault between the red-light runner and the distracted driver.
Speeding vs. Illegal Turns
Another classic comparative fault scenario involves a driver making a left turn across traffic. Usually, the turning driver is at fault for failing to yield. However, if the oncoming driver was driving 20 miles per hour over the speed limit, the blame is shared. An attorney will argue that the crash would not have happened if the oncoming driver had obeyed the speed limit, thus fighting to reduce your percentage of fault if you were the one turning.
Multi-Vehicle Chain Reactions
Chain-reaction rear-end crashes on busy highways require complex fault analysis. In a three-car pileup, the driver in the very back is usually assigned the most fault for following too closely. However, if the middle driver suddenly slammed on their brakes for no reason, they might bear 30 percent of the blame. Filing a Form SH-10074, New Mexico, Department of Transportation, Uniform Crash Report accurately is the first step in establishing who initiated the chain reaction.
How Adjusters Try to Unfairly Shift Blame
Because every percentage point of fault assigned to you saves the insurance company money, claims adjusters are trained to find ways to blame you. They might take your recorded statement and twist your words. For example, if you say, "I didn't see him coming," the adjuster might claim you were not keeping a proper lookout. A local New Mexico car accident lawyer counters this by gathering independent evidence, such as dashcam footage, 911 audio, and expert accident reconstruction testimonies, to prove the other driver was the primary cause of the wreck.
How Much Does a Car Accident Lawyer Cost?
Victims often worry about the cost of hiring an attorney, but the personal injury system is designed to be affordable.
- Contingency Fees: Most car accident lawyers in New Mexico work on a contingency fee basis. This means they charge zero upfront fees. They only get paid if they win your case or secure a settlement.
- Standard Rates: The typical fee is 33.3 percent (one-third) of your final settlement. If the case goes to court and requires a full trial, the fee usually increases to 40 percent due to the extra labor involved.
- Advanced Case Costs: Your lawyer will advance the money needed for police reports, medical records, and expert witnesses. These costs are reimbursed out of the final settlement.
How Long Does the Settlement Process Take?
The timeline heavily depends on the severity of your injuries and how fiercely the insurance company disputes fault. A straightforward claim with clear fault might settle in 3 to 6 months. However, if fault is contested under the comparative negligence rule, the case may need to be filed in the Third Judicial District Court, Las Cruces or another district court. Litigation can extend the timeline from 12 to 24 months, especially if depositions and mediation are required.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What happens if fault is split 50/50?
Under New Mexico's pure comparative negligence system, if you are 50 percent at fault, you can still recover exactly 50 percent of your total damages from the other driver's insurance company.
Should I give a recorded statement to the other driver's insurance?
Generally, you should never give a recorded statement to the opposing insurance adjuster without an attorney present. They will use your statement to try and assign a higher percentage of comparative fault to you.
Does failing to wear a seatbelt affect my fault?
No. Under NMSA 1978, § 66-7-373(A) and the landmark ruling in Thomas v. Henson, 102 N.M. 326 (NM Supreme Court 1985), failing to wear a seatbelt does not constitute comparative negligence in New Mexico and cannot be used by the defense to apportion fault or reduce your financial recovery.
Can a passenger be assigned comparative fault?
It is rare, but possible. For example, if a passenger grabs the steering wheel or knowingly gets into a car with a severely intoxicated driver, a jury might assign them a portion of the fault for their own injuries.
How is the final fault percentage actually decided?
During the claims phase, fault is negotiated between your attorney and the insurance adjuster. If an agreement cannot be reached, a judge or a jury will determine the exact percentage of fault at trial.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!