How Pure Comparative Fault Affects Your Personal Injury Settlement in Washington
Washington is a 'pure comparative fault' state. This means you can still recover financial compensation for your injuries even if you were 99% responsible for the accident. However, your final settlement will be reduced by your exact percentage of fault.
Understanding Pure Comparative Fault in Washington
After an accident in Washington State, one of the most contentious battles with the insurance company will be over who is to blame. In some states, if you are even 1% at fault for a crash, you are legally barred from getting any money at all. Fortunately, Washington operates under a much fairer system known as 'pure comparative fault' (or pure comparative negligence). Governed by the Wash. Rev. Code § 4.22.005, this law dictates that fault is not an all-or-nothing concept. Instead, liability is divided into percentages.
Under this system, you can file a claim against another party even if you were mostly responsible for the incident. For example, if a jury at the Snohomish County Superior Court, Everett decides your total damages (medical bills, lost wages, pain) are $100,000, but they also find you 60% at fault for speeding, you can still walk away with $40,000. Because percentages directly impact your payout, insurance adjusters will fight aggressively to shift as much blame onto you as possible. It is highly advised to hire a local personal injury lawyer from our directory to defend your share of the liability.
How Insurance Companies Use Comparative Fault to Reduce Payouts
Insurance adjusters are experts at using the comparative fault law against you. Their primary goal is to save the company money, and every percentage point of blame they can pin on you translates to thousands of dollars they do not have to pay. From the moment you report the accident, the adjuster will search for ways to argue that you contributed to your own injuries.
They may claim you were driving a few miles over the speed limit, that you failed to use a turn signal, or that you were distracted by your radio. They will also request a recorded statement from you, hoping you will innocently say something like, 'I didn't see them coming,' which they will twist into an admission of 'inattentive driving.' You are under no legal obligation to provide a recorded statement to the other driver's insurance company without your attorney present.
Disputing Fault Assignments in Police Reports
Many victims believe that if a police officer from the Washington State Patrol, Olympia writes a traffic collision report blaming them for the accident, their case is ruined. This is a myth. While police reports are valuable pieces of evidence, they are not the final word on legal liability. Police officers often arrive after the crash, relying only on brief witness statements and quick observations.
Your personal injury attorney can dispute an unfavorable police report by launching an independent investigation. Lawyers frequently hire accident reconstruction experts who use tire skid marks, vehicle black box data (Event Data Recorders), and nearby security camera footage to prove the other driver was actually the primary cause of the accident, thereby reducing your comparative fault percentage.
Examples of Shared Fault in Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions
Comparative fault is especially relevant in cases involving vulnerable road users in busy areas like downtown Seattle or Bellevue. Consider these common scenarios:
- Pedestrian Accidents: If a pedestrian is hit by a drunk driver but was jaywalking outside of a marked crosswalk at the time, a jury might determine the pedestrian was 20% at fault for not using the crosswalk, while the drunk driver is 80% at fault. The pedestrian can still recover 80% of their damages.
- Bicycle Accidents: If a bicyclist is sideswiped by a commercial delivery truck, but the bicyclist was riding at night without required reflective gear or proper lighting, the insurance company will strongly argue comparative fault. The cyclist might be assigned 30% blame for reduced visibility, reducing their final compensation accordingly.
Costs and Legal Action
Protecting yourself from unfair fault assignments does not require you to pay out of pocket. Washington injury attorneys operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning they take a percentage (typically 33% to 40%) of the final settlement. They will front the costs for hiring accident reconstruction experts and paying court filing fees ($290 to $310). Because they only get paid if you win, they are heavily motivated to minimize your percentage of comparative fault and maximize your final payout.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What happens if I am found to be 99% at fault?
Because Washington is a 'pure' comparative fault state, you can still recover 1% of your damages from the other party. However, the other party can also counter-sue you for the 99% of their damages that you caused.
Who decides the exact percentage of fault?
Initially, your lawyer and the insurance adjuster negotiate the percentage of fault during settlement talks. If they cannot agree, the case goes to trial, and a jury will assign the exact percentages to each party.
Can comparative fault apply if I was a passenger in a crash?
Yes, though it is rare. An insurance company might argue comparative fault against a passenger if the passenger knew the driver was severely intoxicated but chose to ride with them anyway, or if the passenger actively distracted the driver.
Does failing to wear a seatbelt count as comparative fault in Washington?
No. Under Wash. Rev. Code § 46.61.688(6) and established case law in Clark v. Payne, 61 Wash. App. 189 (WA Court of Appeals 1991), failing to wear a safety belt assembly does not constitute negligence and cannot be admitted as evidence of comparative fault to reduce your injury settlement.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!